(This is a longer post than normal so you may want to read it in two settings)
I try not to make these blogs too teachy and try to avoid didactic language, but there comes a time when circumstances call me to go deeper and to call upon the little biblical training I have and the more extensive and subsequent studies I have undertaken through the years.
The presence of moral evil in the world is, while still difficult to explain, a little more easy to deal with than is the presence of what I call ‘natural evil’ (earthquakes, tornadoes, tsunamis etc). The recent disastrous earthquake in Haiti has caused a lot of questioning as to not only why such events occur, but what role do people play in bringing such things upon themselves?
As is often the case, the Bible is most helpful, and in particular the words of Jesus:
“Now there were some present at that time who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. Jesus answered, “Do you think that these Galileans were worse sinners than all the other Galileans because they suffered this way? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish. Or those eighteen who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them—do you think they were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.” (Luke 13:1-5)
In this passage, Jesus was faced with the same question that we are so often still faced with some 2,000 years later – do people suffer because they have done bad things?
You may have heard about the comments that Pat Robertson made on the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti – if not, you can see listen to them in context HERE. Firstly, I want to say that I have the utmost respect for Mr. Robertson – he is a man of wisdom and integrity and one who has led and influenced many, many people towards a deeper walk with God. Further, I do not judge His heart, for this is not my job – judgment belongs to God alone.
However, in referencing Haiti’s previous ‘pact with the devil’ and voodoo in connection with the Earthquake, Mr. Robertson was portraying some commonly held thinking: that good things happen to good people and bad things happen to bad people; it is an idea that can be found in just about every major religion of the world and one that is as old as paganism itself. Thankfully Jesus, in His unmatched wisdom, gives us the answer:
“…do you think they (those killed by the falling tower) were more guilty than all the others living in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish”
Or, put in a more modern day context I would add: do you think those Haitians are more guilty than the Dominicans (who live on the other side of the island and were untouched by the earthquake)? No.
The idea that good things happen to good people and that bad things befall those who are guilty of ‘worse’ sins, and that God judges those guilty of ‘worse’ sins troubles me on several levels:
1. It denies the concept of grace – the undeserved, unmerited favor of God
This favor that cannot be earned through our good works nor bought at any cost. The very idea that if I do good, God will bless me, but if I do bad then God will withdraw His blessing and, maybe, even send judgment upon me is contrary to the new covenant concept of grace.
However, it is not just perceived personal sin and righteousness to which people apply this principle, but many use the same idea on a nationalistic level.
I am reminded of the mindset that was present in Britain in the not too distant past which basically went like this: Britain was a Christian nation, therefore, God’s special favor and blessing rested upon us – we enjoyed freedom, prosperity and military strength as a result of God’s special blessing and, furthermore, it was our duty to bring our form of religion and government to other less ‘fortunate’ parts of the world. The blessings of economic prosperity, of civil government, democracy and ‘freedom’ were seen as a reflection of God’s special blessing upon our nation. We were a Christian nation, therefore God was blessing us.
2. The idea paints a picture of God that is inconsistent with the New Testament revelation of what He is like in Christ.
There is a remarkable conversation between Phillip and Jesus, recorded in John 14:
Philip said, “Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us.” Jesus answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? (8-9).
Phillip was a 1st century Jew living in Palestine, and the only revelation of God had been through the Old Testament. I cannot help but wonder about the fact that Jesus looked and acted so differently to the God of the Old Testament, that it spurred the question, ‘show us the Father’ – He just looked so different from the God of the Old.
This would seem to be confirmed by the first few verses of the letter to the Hebrews 1:
Verse 1: In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways
God had spoken through the prophets – He used obedient and godly people to communicate His heart and to pronounce judgment; God spoke many, many times and in a variety of ways in order that the hearts of sinful people would receive His word, turn from their sin and do His will
Verse 2: But in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.
But now, God sent His only Son, and spoke through Him, Christ Jesus, a new and better way – a way of grace, a way of love, a way of compassion, mercy and justice – where we are called to ‘love our enemies’, and to do good to those who mistreat us – a new covenant where God’s favor is not earned, but received through the free gift of His son.
Verse 3: The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word.
The phrase, ‘exact representation’ is from the Greek word, ‘charakter’ from which we get the English word, ‘character’, but here means, “the exact expression (the image) of any person or thing, marked likeness, precise reproduction in every respect”
‘Being’ comes from the Greek word, ‘hupostasis’, meaning, “the substantial quality, nature, of a person or thing.
The Greek is very forceful – Jesus is the exact representation of what God is like.
3. The view makes the atonement of Christ insufficient in dealing with people’s sin.
To suggest that bad things happen to certain people because their sins are deemed worse than others and to then suggest that God is judging them is to deny the fact that judgment for sin was made at the cross – indeed, I would go as far to say that to persist with this view that God is continually bringing judgment on people is a denial of the sufficiency of the atonement of Christ for sin. The scriptures tell us that atonement for sin was made once and for all through Jesus’ death and resurrection (Heb 10:12). The cross is a place where ‘mercy triumphs over judgment’ (James 2:13).
A final judgment is indeed coming, when all who persist in their refusal of the offer of God’s forgiveness for sin will be judged. But until then, His offer of life through Christ is abundantly available to all – unearned, undeserved and unmerited.
On the next blog, I will talk more about why I believe natural evil (earthquakes, tsunamis, tornados etc) exist, and why God doesn’t do anything to stop them, with a final appeal to the majesty and mystery of God. Until then, what are your thoughts on this really difficult subject?









